Quote:
Originally Posted by JakerzScrub
but it gives the gaming industry more incentive to work with an already complete game.
|
That is true and fine. But what doesn't give me great satisfaction and encouragement is when developers hold off levels, content that should have been introduced and included with the game when it is originally released. I'm specifically talking about how developers are putting out the bare minimum, even developers who start working on DLC before the game has even gone gold. That's bullshit!
There's nothing wrong with DLC coming out for a game like Halo. The developers invest an ample sum of time into developing the game, and it's a quality product. However...
Quote:
|
Would you rather wait 2-3 months longer for games to be released so the producers can make/create those cars you purchased or even those songs.
|
Wait. So from what you are saying, it is ok to be charged additional fees for those cars and songs that should have been included in the package to begin with?
From the implication of your statement, I'd wait 2-3 months longer just to be assured that my game won't have a vast array of
bugs.... It is a quite commonality in a lot of the games this generation.
Quote:
|
Drop the price of games to say $45, produce the game fast, if the gamer likes the game they can spend $15 for the multi-player version, another $5 for maps, another $5 for game-play styles and so forth and so on...The options are nearly limitless.
|
Yeah, you're right, and that's completely
STUPID. That's like going with Xbox 360 and adding a HDDVD drive, Wi-Fi and all the other gimmicks and gadgets just so that it can match up with PlayStation 3.... and the only problem is that it costs a lot more than what the standard retail price of PS3 would cost.
STUPID!
Someone needs to take an Economics class or something.